| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Aaron Honk
Distributed Denial of Service
110
|
Posted - 2016.05.13 03:53:21 -
[1] - Quote
This is so frustrating when you forget a 0 in your price and you instantaneously sell to buy orders... This shouldn't happen.
I don't understand why we don't have a confirmation when this happen when the opposite exist ? When you try to place a buy order for 10x the prices you are warned "The price you have chosen is 623,46 % above regional average. Are you sure you want to enter this order?"
https://i.imgur.com/mXQjzmO.png |

Aaron Honk
Distributed Denial of Service
110
|
Posted - 2016.05.13 04:28:41 -
[2] - Quote
Iain Cariaba wrote:Redundant thread is redundant, and has been reported for redundancy.
There, was that sentence more redundant than this whine thread made for no reason than you couldn't be bothered to look twice at the number you entered?
Your answer might be redundant as well then. The feature is a legitimate demand that would help a lot of people. And there is no reason why this have not been implemented yet.
And if you think I don't double check prices before I enter an order, you are wrong. I even enabled the warning after each order. I'm not drunk either or tired. But when you enter an order 2.209.000.000 is really easily confused with 220.900.000 |

Aaron Honk
Distributed Denial of Service
110
|
Posted - 2016.05.13 05:01:38 -
[3] - Quote
ShahFluffers wrote:Aaron Honk wrote:The feature is a legitimate demand that would help a lot of people. And there is no reason why this have not been implemented yet. Likewise, there is no good reason why it should be implemented beyond "there should be a mechanism to prevent me making a mistake." Mistakes happen. They are a part of the game. Be more diligent next time. Hell... there are countless ways to "fatfinger" things while flying out in space. Why should market orders be the "special snowflake" and get extra safety nets? edit: also... "demanding" that something be changes is not a good way to go about things. You are not entitled to anything any more than the rest of us.
Ok so, please explain to me why this feature exist ingame for setting up buy orders ? Shouldn't we remove it then ? Why is there a "safety net" in one way but not the other ?
I also used the search function and obviously I found a lot of similar topic. But none of them had a response from a dev |

Aaron Honk
Distributed Denial of Service
110
|
Posted - 2016.05.13 05:09:13 -
[4] - Quote
ShahFluffers wrote:Aaron Honk wrote:Ok so, please explain to me why this feature exist ingame for setting up buy orders ? Shouldn't we remove it then ? Why is there a "safety net" in on way but not the other ? Hmmm... you're right. It probably should be removed. I very much dislike "safety mechanisms." It is much more entertaining and interesting when mistakes are a very real possibility. Aaron Honk wrote:I also used the search function and obviously I found a lot of similar topic. But none of them had a response from a dev DEVs rarely respond here. Like... at all. They prefer players to hash out the ideas and argue why the idea/change is justified or what possible effects can be caused by them (because players can often see things DEVs can't). Then they cherry pick the best ideas among them.
Ok then remove every warning ingame, eve is too easy right ? Way to think backward. |

Aaron Honk
Distributed Denial of Service
110
|
Posted - 2016.05.13 05:46:36 -
[5] - Quote
I never seen a single piece of advertisement from CCP describing EVE as "hardcore" and "punishing to the lazy and dumb". This idea is being carried out by elitist people that think something different is always bad.
You didn't bring a single argument to prove that this idea would be bad for the game. It doesn't make it harder to lose a lot of money, it make it frustrating. and eventually people leave because of this. CCP made a lot of improvements to the interface to make it more appealing and warnings are a part of it. For example for a long time it was suggested to add a warning when you push the "reset quickbar" button, and it was finally implemented. On top of this warnings are not mandatory and eventually you can disable them if they really annoy you.
And your comparison with cars, wtf did you smoke before posting this ? It's literally comparing oranges to dogs. But maybe you want EVE to look something like this : https://i.imgur.com/WCiw6x4.jpg ? You need a time machine buddy |

Aaron Honk
Distributed Denial of Service
110
|
Posted - 2016.05.13 07:43:39 -
[6] - Quote
Iain Cariaba wrote:Aaron Honk wrote:I never seen a single piece of advertisement from CCP describing EVE as "hardcore" and "punishing to the lazy and dumb". Advertised as such, no. However, it is the common consensus of gamers who know what's what, that this is true. Aaron Honk wrote:You didn't bring a single argument to prove that this idea would be bad for the game. It doesn't make it harder to lose a lot of money, it make it frustrating. and eventually people leave because of this. CCP made a lot of improvements to the interface to make it more appealing and warnings are a part of it. For example for a long time it was suggested to add a warning when you push the "reset quickbar" button, and it was finally implemented. On top of this warnings are not mandatory and eventually you can disable them if they really annoy you. You didn't bring a single argument that wasn't "OMAGERD!!!! CCP, save me from myself!!!" Seriously, why is it such a difficult concept for people to understand? Double check your numbers before you hit OK. Anyone with a single iota of sense does this IRL all the time. You double check the totals at the store to make sure you didn't get overcharged. The store doesn't do this for you, it's up to you. You get statements so you can make sure there's no extra charges on your credit card. The bank doesn't do the comparison for you, it's up to you. There doesn't need to be more warnings to keep you from ******* up. You just need to use your brain something more than filling the void between your ears.
Woah you start to be aggressive here. My argument is that it would be a great gameplay improvement for everyone including trader but also regular people who get ripped of everyday and get frustrated. And eventually leave. If you think I am the only one to make a mistake, no, many other have as well. I didn't 'quit' for this much but i'm pretty sure other would. There is nothing to learn from that mistake. For instance, if there was a toggle able warning not on by default, after making this mistake you would learn that you should toggle the warning on so you don't make that mistake again.
Using your brain have nothing to do with it, this is another far fetched comparison like the other dude with his electric car.
Please say it "adding a warning to avoid selling below market price would not be a great gameplay improvement and would not help people" |

Aaron Honk
Distributed Denial of Service
110
|
Posted - 2016.05.13 10:01:20 -
[7] - Quote
Celthric Kanerian wrote:You've played since 2005 and still unable to see the difference between 200.000.00 and 2.000.000.00?
You seem to think that experience improve the amount of attention you pay to using the market but I think it's the exact opposite, the more you get accustomed to it and the faster you will use it, the greater the odds for a mistake to happen are.
|

Aaron Honk
Distributed Denial of Service
110
|
Posted - 2016.05.13 11:53:57 -
[8] - Quote
This is not a "hand-holding mechanics". This is an improvement of an already existing interface. It's simple to understand, If I try to place a Buy Order for 10x the price then it warns me : https://i.imgur.com/iXbzXKa.png
It have nothing to do with PVP, this have plenty of warnings (security level/warning at low sec gates)
It have nothing to do with manufacturing, I have no idea how you can miss click the manufacturing window, and I do plenty of it.
It have nothing to do with hauling, I have no idea how you make mistake hauling stuff. Please enlight me, if someone haul B worth of stuff in Niarja this is not a mistake, this is bad judgement, and if eventually you get destroyed here, then you can say your experience improved
Can someone here please tell me their real reason why they don't want this feature in ? And please stop with the "EVE is to ez" nonsense.
Serendipity Lost wrote:
Until CCP makes your market transactions idiot proof I'll recommend you slow and pay more attention. I totally agree though, the game should have installed safeguards so that players can 'win' no matter how careless or wreck less they are. I mean, who wants to think these days?
So far the only argument that have been proposed is that it would make the game too easy, it wouldn't in my opinion. |

Aaron Honk
Distributed Denial of Service
110
|
Posted - 2016.05.13 12:55:08 -
[9] - Quote
Yochi Miyatsuda wrote:
It's not a question of making Eve "too easy," it's about feature-creep.
This feature already exist ingame it's nothing new, not a feature creep. It also does not go beyond the basic function of the product . Also I am troubled how you navigate from a warning interface to a buy below region average restriction ? You seem to compare a simple warning with something that would indeed affect gameplay. Adding a warning does not dictate how anyone is playing and it would not make eve less complex.
If I petition CCP I'm pretty sure they would tell me to post here. On top of that, having a ticket resolved under 2 week is impossible so it is just unnecessary to make ticket for this.
You still have not answered my question, how a simple feature such as a warning would affect your gameplay in a negative way ? |

Aaron Honk
Distributed Denial of Service
110
|
Posted - 2016.05.13 13:08:16 -
[10] - Quote
Serendipity Lost wrote:
OK, enough of this. How much did you lose? (I'm trying to put an isk value on 'CCP needs to fix this')
It doesn't matter how much I lost it was not that much anyway
elitatwo wrote:
It is obvious, think of the noobs and children. Scammers and market bots need a little love. They always feel so left out as if they didn't belong.
I did not mention noobs, or market bots or scammer ? if anything... market bots would not make mistakes like that, and scammers what do they have to do with all of this ? |

Aaron Honk
Distributed Denial of Service
110
|
Posted - 2016.05.13 14:39:15 -
[11] - Quote
Iain Cariaba wrote:Aaron Honk wrote:Yochi Miyatsuda wrote:
It's not a question of making Eve "too easy," it's about feature-creep.
This feature already exist ingame it's nothing new, not a feature creep. It also does not go beyond the basic function of the product . You realize you just gave the very definition of feature creep, right?
That definition does not match the feature I propose. I checked before posting
Feature creep, creeping featurism or featuritis is the ongoing expansion or addition of new features in a product, such as in computer software. Extra features go beyond the basic function of the product and so can result in software bloat and over-complication rather than simple design.
Edit : apparently the rest of you already started doing personal attacks, I will ignore all of those because it's beyond the point |

Aaron Honk
Distributed Denial of Service
110
|
Posted - 2016.05.14 01:13:30 -
[12] - Quote
Sonya Corvinus wrote:So now you want to get rid of a few decent ways to make quick isk scamming too?
No. I've never misread a price in four years. Just take the extra half a second to read.
Getting rid of what ? I didn't propose we get rid of anything. I said the regional average indicator could be bigger and eventually show a different color if you try to sell on the cheap.
Iain Cariaba wrote:Yeah, that needs to be removed from the game.
I propose you make your own idea thread and we can discuss it. Because you are able to read thing doesn't mean everyone can. With that argument we might as well never implement a colorblind mode because most can see well enough ?
My question again, what is the real reason why you don't want to see this implemented ? |

Aaron Honk
Distributed Denial of Service
110
|
Posted - 2016.05.14 03:25:09 -
[13] - Quote
Sonya Corvinus wrote: My question still stands.
I honestly wonder what you're doing if you are misreading so many orders to ask for this. Pay attention!
I don't missread "so many orders" what are you talking about ? It's not like I do a mistake every week? I can't even remember last time i did that
Iain Cariaba wrote:Aaron Honk wrote:My question again, what is the real reason why you don't want to see this implemented ? Because if you have half a brain and/or the ability to learn from your mistakes, then you don't need this. If you lack the previously stated requirements, you won't be playing this game long enough for this idea to matter. Either way....
Doesn't answer my question. You keep bringing brain issues like a broken record. If you have a brain you don't need a warning when you jump into lowsec, if you have a brain you don't need a warning when you click reset quickbar... I'm talking about improving EVE and you literally want to make it worst.
I play since 2005 I'm not sure if that's long enough for you tho |

Aaron Honk
Distributed Denial of Service
110
|
Posted - 2016.05.14 04:45:33 -
[14] - Quote
Sonya Corvinus wrote:Aaron Honk wrote:I don't missread "so many orders" what are you talking about ? It's not like I do a mistake every week? I can't even remember last time i did that You sure? You're the one who started this thread simply because you couldn't read market orders. Remember that? Why, again, is it so hard for you to simply re-read what you type?
I reread every order I make. I even have the warning after each order pop up and I have to click yes or no to confirm the order. Managing as much orders as I do is not simple and sometimes some slip through the crack.
I even propose alternatives to my original proposition, we could for example add a line that state the price per unit you are selling, here is a picture of that idea https://i.imgur.com/NFmcSag.png |

Aaron Honk
Distributed Denial of Service
110
|
Posted - 2016.05.14 05:35:47 -
[15] - Quote
Sonya Corvinus wrote: Come on man.
I've played this game for four years and literally never done a market order incorrectly. Stop complaining because you're not capable of taking two seconds to read an order you're buying or placing. You do know how to read, yeah?
Is that all you can do personal attacks ? Obviously I can read, you never made a mistake well that's good for you. The fact you never made a mistake doesn't mean the UI could and sould not be improved. I am not the only one in the case I describe, if I was maybe I would be the only one making this thread ?
I'm saying the system could be better. All you want is make it worst, and there is no reason for it. I already proposed 3 ideas to improve things and you have proposed 0. |

Aaron Honk
Distributed Denial of Service
110
|
Posted - 2016.05.14 05:47:21 -
[16] - Quote
Sonya Corvinus wrote:
Sorry, what personal attacks? Your entire idea is centered around people who don't read when they buy things, and it limits emergent gameplay.
Again, come on main. Stop trolling.
I am not trolling, you and the other guy seems to imply that I am mentally challenged for making a market mistake, I have a brain and I double check my orders.
example of a personal attack for that other dude >
Quote:Because if you have half a brain and/or the ability to learn from your mistakes, then you don't need this.
And I'm not trolling, I am 100% serious on the ideas I proposed. I don't think it would stop emergent gmaeplay because there are no market strategy influencing the amount of money you can earn from people doing those mistakes, this is just pure luck. |

Aaron Honk
Distributed Denial of Service
110
|
Posted - 2016.05.14 06:14:09 -
[17] - Quote
Sonya Corvinus wrote:Aaron Honk wrote:I am not trolling, you and the other guy seems to imply that I am mentally challenged for making a market mistake, I have a brain and I double check my orders. If you double checked your orders you would never have the problem you brought up in this thread. Honest question, why are you saying you have a hard time doing that? Other than trolling, how is that hard? That's a legitimate question. Look forward to your answer. And don't reference what other people say in replies to me please. I speak for myself.
but i DO double check my orders, as I said I even have the warning enabled for each order. For the other question, my last proposition would help a lot placing orders, the one where you see the amount you get for each item |

Aaron Honk
Distributed Denial of Service
110
|
Posted - 2016.05.14 06:25:18 -
[18] - Quote
Sonya Corvinus wrote:Aaron Honk wrote:but i DO double check my orders, as I said I even have the warning enabled for each order. For the other question, my last proposition would help a lot placing orders, the one where you see the amount you get for each item Right....If you did double check your orders, you wouldn't mistype any of them. Don't ask for game changes in a sandbox to make up for something you messed up. I've been placing orders for four years and never messed up once. You know...read before you click OK. Best of luck mate. I'm not wasting any more time here.
Other have, again, I am not a special snowflake, this feature improvement would help a lot more people than only me. The fact you are good doesn't mean things should be improved. You probably never reset your quickbar by accident either, yet a warning was added to that system.
|

Aaron Honk
Distributed Denial of Service
112
|
Posted - 2016.05.14 16:58:00 -
[19] - Quote
Sonya Corvinus wrote:Aaron Honk wrote:Other have, again, I am not a special snowflake, this feature improvement would help a lot more people than only me. The fact you are good doesn't mean things should not be improved. You probably never reset your quickbar by accident either, yet a warning was added to that system. I'm in favor of not having the warning we have already, not having green/yellow/red to stop accidentally shooting people in HS, having no local in sov null, among other things. The game has been dumbed down enough already. You don't have to be 'good' to read something before buying/selling Sorry, but still no.
This is apparently not the way dev are choosing to develop the game, and it's for the best in my opinion. Change is hard, but you don't have to be scared about it. This warning will not impact your gameplay in any way if you are good enough to never make mistakes. |

Aaron Honk
Distributed Denial of Service
112
|
Posted - 2016.05.14 17:44:14 -
[20] - Quote
Sonya Corvinus wrote:Aaron Honk wrote:This is apparently not the way dev are choosing to develop the game, and it's for the best in my opinion. Change is hard, but you don't have to be scared about it. This warning will not impact your gameplay in any way if you are good enough to never make mistakes. Change is hard, so don't be scared when you have to change the way you're thinking. Get the hint with the responses you've gotten :)
I already changed the way I though. Before I was not using the warning after each order setup. Also before I was setting up big stacks and now I split item by group of 5 or 10. |
| |
|